Kemp 1987, the supreme court revisited the issue of racial discrimination in application of the death penalty. After holding an evidentiary hearing, the superior court denied relief. In the past quarter century, few cases on criminal law and procedure have had the reach and impact of mc cleskey v. In 1978, petitioner, a black man, was convicted in a georgia trial court of armed robbery and murder, arising from the killing of a white police officer during the robbery of a store. Kemp the case began with warren mccleskey, an africanamerican man who was sentenced to death in 1978 for killing a white police officer during the robbery of a georgia furniture store. The latest versions of adobe reader do not support viewing pdf files within firefox on. Finally, mccleskeys statistical proffer must be viewed in the context of his challenge. In that case, a black male defendant was convicted of. Clark, was stopped for driving 45 mph in a 35 mph zone. Recognizing implicit bias within the equal protection framework. Justice lewis powell, the author of the decision, later revealed to his biographer that it was the one decision in which he would change his vote jeffries 1994. Kemp, superintendent, georgia diagnostic and classification center, 481 u.
Twenty years ago today, warren mccleskey died in georgias electric chair for the murder of a police officer yet the question reverberates. Kemp, the supreme court rendered statistical evidence of racial disparities doctrinally irrelevant to a criminal defendants equal protection claim. Kemp 1987 was a 54 us supreme court decision that upheld a death sentence for warren mccleskey, rejecting the claim that statistical evidence of racial bias in sentencing could prove an individuals death sentence unconstitutional. Recognizing implicit bias within the equal protection framework by alyson grine and emily coward p ublic defender davis cant shake a bad feeling she has about her case, which started with a traf. It is the ultimate duty of court to determine on a casebycase basis whether the laws of the states are applied consistently with the constitution. In attacking his death sentence, mccleskey brought before the court an expert statistical study, widely known as the baldus study, that indicated that juries in georgia are far more likely to. Supreme court justice john paul stevens questioned the. Ldf files amicus brief urging north carolina supreme court. Warren mccleskey is a black man who was sentenced to death in 1978 for the murder of a white police officer in atlanta, georgia. The supreme courts decision in mccleskey protected criminal justice laws and policies from being challenged on the basis of racially disparate impact. Download pdf with prejudice free online new books in.
Kemp audio transcription for oral argument october 15, 1986 in mccleskey v. Short of direct, smoking gun proof of racism, the racial bias in our criminal justice system, as proven by the baldus study, is shielded from scrutiny due to this case. Sundby if one is known by the company that one keeps, justice powell no doubt wished for far better company for one of his final decisions, mccleskey v. Warren mccleskey was a black man convicted of murdering a white police officer in fulton county. Kemp file, thurgood marshall papers, the library of congress, washington, d. This became a major constitutional challenge to the death penalty in the usa and resulted in the landmark ruling mccleskey v kemp, announced by the us supreme court on 22 april 1987. Bollinger, chief justice rehnquistpart of the mccleskey majorityinvoked admissions data to support his conclusion that the university of michigan law school had unconstitutionally. The supreme court found, however,that statistical analysis indicating a. What links here related changes upload file special pages permanent link page. The evidence at trial indicated that mccleskey and three accomplices planned. Mccleskey, a black man, was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of. One important statement of regret came from the author of mccleskey v.
Ldf filed an amicus brief urging the north carolina. Kemp 1987, the court returns to legalistic arguments. The most farreaching postgregg challenge to capital sentencing came in mccleskey v. Mccleskey, a black man, was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of murder in the superior court of fulton county, georgia, on october 12, 1978. Defendant, claimed that this was a violation of his fourteenth and eighth amendment rights. The superior court of fulton county denied mccleskeys extraordinary motion for a new trial. Ldf files brief calling for end of the death penalty in. Since it is my view that the unconscious operation of irrational sympathies and antipathies, including. Kemp in 1987, the united states supreme court decided the case of mccleskey v. The supreme court of georgia denied mccleskeys application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal the superior courts denial of his.
Motion for leave to file brief amici curiae and brief amici curiae for dr. One of the claims again centered on evans testimony, alleging that the state had an. Kemp supreme court ruling that effectively condoned racism in capital cases in 1978 warren mccleskey, a black man, killed a white police officer in georgia. To prevail under the equal protection clause of the united states constitution constitution, a person must show that the decision makers in a particular case acted with discriminatory purpose. One study, the charging and sentencing study css, analyzed 2,484 georgia homicide cases, processed between 1973 and 1979, which had resulted in convictions for murder or voluntary manslaughter to determine the extent to which race influenced the decisions that lead to the imposition of a death sentence. And indeed, the racial effects, as judge forester saw the system in georgia, actually increased. The case arose in georgia, and mccleskey offered statistical evidence showing that the death penalty in georgia was more likely to be imposed upon afroamerican defendants, particularly when the victim was caucasian. Mccleskey was a black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the supreme court of fulton county, georgia. Supreme court ruled, in a sharplydivided 54 opinion, that georgias capital punishment did not violate federal law.
Olson solicitor general counsel of record michael chertoff assistant attorney general michael r. Southern states, charging them to search laboriously, file by file, for the. For the question to outlive him is a damning commentary on capital punishment in the united states. Jun 19, 2011 rehearing denied june 17, 1991 see 501 u. Kemp is a profound decision because it essentially shielded the criminal justice system, as a whole, from claims of racial bias. A case study of kentuckys racial justice act, 12 wash.
Capital punishment, death penalty, capital sentencing, mccleskey v. Mccleskey then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the superior court of butts county. Ldf files amicus brief urging north carolina supreme court to. Kemp, went all the way to the supreme court, where the death penalty in georgia was upheld by a 54 vote. Each team should appoint two people to represent mccleskey, two people to represent kemp, and one to act as a supreme court judge. One of mccleskey s main issues on appeal was that georgias death penalty, in its application, discriminated on the basis of race. Read a pdf of our statement here ldf files amicus brief urging north carolina supreme court to address race discrimination in death penalty cases brief calls for defendants to receive new sentences or have chance to challenge claims of racial bias under north carolinas racial justice act today, the naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc. Mccleskeys convictions arose out of the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer during the course of the robbery. The supreme court of georgia denied mccleskey s application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal the superior courts denial of his petition, no. In the supreme court of tennessee at jackson april. Gronhovd, social science statistics in the courtroom.
The court said the racially disproportionate impact in the georgia death penalty indicated by a comprehensive scientific study was not enough to overturn the guilty verdict without showing a racially discriminatory. Ultimately, the mccleskey decision set the stage for more than 20 years of dramatically increasing racial disparities within the criminal justice system. Few cases involving the intersection of race, criminal law, and procedure have had the reach and impact of mccleskey v. The statistical evidence in this case thus relentlessly documents the risk that. Why the court refused to accept statistical evidence. Both sides should present evidence on which only the judge should base a decision. In mccleskey, the supreme court considered evidence of racial bias in the capital punishment system and held that the significant risk of racial discrimination did not violate the constitution. Using social science research, mccleskey argued that a marked pattern of discrimination based on the race of the victim existed in capital cases.
He was convicted by a jury of 11 whites and 1 african american, and was sentenced to death. Defendant, a black man, was convicted of two counts of robbery and one count of murder. Both sides should present evidence on which only the judge should base a. At trial, the jury recommended that mccleskey be sentenced to death on the murder charge and two. Sandford civil war 18611865 th, 14th, and 15th amendments.
In 1987, ldf mounted a challenge against georgias operation of the death penalty under the eighth and fourteenth amendments in mccleskey v. Just mercy teaching guide 201718 lower division studies. The evidence at trial indicated that mccleskey and three accomplices. Virginia on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of virginia june 20, 2002 chief justice rehnquist, with whom justice scalia and justice thomas join, dissenting.
As is now wellknown, the case bearing this evidence, mccleskey v. Mccleskey defendant, an african american man, was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of murdering a caucasian police officer in atlanta, georgia. Kemp, racial bias in capital cases, racial attitudes of capital defense lawyers, empirical legal studies, implicit association test, iat, race iat, implicit racial attitudes created date. Ldf files amicus brief urging north carolina supreme court to address race discrimination in death penalty cases brief calls for defendants to receive new sentences or have chance to challenge claims of racial bias under north carolinas racial justice act today, the naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc. Here the high court was provided huge amounts of the very best statistical evidence the baldus study that showed that black defendants were much more likely to be.
To rebut petitioner mccleskey s alibi defense at his 1978 georgia trial for murder and a related crime, the state called offie evans, the occupant of the jail cell next to mccleskey s, who testified that mccleskey had admitted and boasted about the killing. For one thing, a dissent from a summary order does not have the precedential weight of a fully considered opinion of the court. Supreme court rules that a prosecutor who strikes a disproportionate number of citizens of the same race in selecting a jury is required to rebut the inference of discrimination by showing neutral reasons for the strikes. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. In the past quarter century, few cases on criminal law and procedure have had the reach and impact of mccleskey v.
Mccleskey, a black man, was convicted of murdering a police officer in georgia and sentenced to death. Kemp, racial bias in capital cases, racial attitudes of capital defense lawyers, empirical legal studies, implicit association test, iat, race iat, implicit racial attitudes. Recognizing implicit bias within the equal protection. Kemp audio transcription for opinion announcement april 22, 1987 in mccleskey v.
Abstractthe litigation campaign that led to mccleskey v. Kemp 1987 case and the adverse impact of mccleskey on the subsequent judicial consideration of statistical evidence even of widespread racial discrimination in the capital and criminal justice systems. Mccleskey s convictions arose out of the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer during the course of the robbery. Audio transcription for oral argument october 15, 1986 in mccleskey v. The latest versions of adobe reader do not support viewing pdf files within firefox on mac os and if you are using a modern intel mac. The latest versions of adobe reader do not support viewing pdf files within firefox on mac os and if. Audio transcription for opinion announcement april 22, 1987 in mccleskey v. Despite overwhelming statistical evidence of racial discrimination, the u. Once this court holds that a pa rticular punishmen t is not cruel and unusual, and thus not barred by the eighth and. Statistical evidence showing that one racial group receives a disproportionate amount of death sentences, as opposed to other groups, is not sufficient to challenge a state death penalty statute under the equal protection clause. Kemp, which, by a 54 vote, allowed georgia to carry out its death penalty law despite racial disparities in its infliction, told his biographer that he now regrets his vote in mccleskey more than any other vote during his tenure on the court. It examines the handiwork of the supreme court in the mccleskey v. Mccleskeys claim that these statistics are sufficient proof of discrimination, without regard to the facts of a particular case, would extend to all capital cases in georgia, at least where the victim was white and the defendant is black. Supreme court of the united states 1987 often ignored in class.
The question presented by this case is whether a national consensus deprives. Yes, your honor, it does allow more discretion, which also works to the benefit of the defendant in any given case. The dissenting opinion of justice powell in stephens v. In attacking his death sentence, mccleskey brought before the court an expert statistical study, widely known as the baldus study, that indicated. In a writ of habeas corpus, mccleskey argued that a statistical study proved that the imposition of the death penalty in georgia depended to some extent on the race of the victim and the accused. So in that first study one of the principal data sources were the trial transcripts themselves. On appeal, defendant presented a complex statistical study that indicated a risk that racial considerations enter into capital sentencing determinations. Karu hangawatte chapter 4 social science used to make law section 1 distinguish legislative facts from adjudicative facts p.
Field notes from 19771991 the litigation campaign that led to mccleskey v. Short of direct, smoking gun proof of racism, the racial bias in our criminal justice system, as proven by the baldus study, is. Mccleskey continued his postconviction attacks by filing a second state habeas corpus action in 1987 which, as amended, contained five claims for relief. The supreme courts legacy on race and capital punishment. In mccleskey, the naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc.
747 875 1053 537 555 1368 841 123 1519 1534 1250 757 606 983 224 1328 452 1064 744 305 1150 343 1021 321 1404 1477 707 420 1285 1241 1246 1209 749 1169 452 572 384